The carbon 14 dating of the ancient temple of Gobelki Tepe has rekindled the debate about the true age of the Sphinx. New evidence suggests may be 8000 years older than previously thought. Gobelki Tepe may be older than we thought! When some 'years ago, Robert Bauval, Graham Hancock, John Anthony and others, challenged the generally accepted dating of the Sphinx, the academics said, shouting "heresy!" Later, Robert Schoch, professor of geology at Boston University, has dated the monument at Giza around 7000 BC, twice the accepted date, citing a similar backdating. "There is no evidence that his may be true," said Carol Redmount Egyptology at the University of California at Berkeley (Los Angeles Times, October 23, 1991). "The people of that region did not have the technology, the institutions of government, or even the desire to build such structures thousands of years before the reign of Khafre." And this, in short, was the vision shared by such scientists and Egyptologists. The Sphinx is in the same period Gobekli Tepe? Caveman could have built the Sphinx? The academicians were faced with a problem of feasibility. How could the Neolithic cavemen have built such an impressive specimen as the Sphinx, for thousands of years before the accepted date of construction for, say, Stonehenge and the pyramids? In an era prior to 3000 BC, scholars quickly noted, were the only known artifacts of flint spear points and tends to hide from the animals. In no way the people of the early Neolithic could have built something as elaborate as the giant pyramids or the Sphinx. A statement, paradoxically, by which the heretics were absolutely agree! In fact, the "heretics" who believed the Sphinx and other ancient monuments were built by a "lost civilization", which was canceled after the last ice age, and spread convincing evidence of this end. But this idea was shunned by academics, who remained steadfast in their dogmatic assertions that the dates had to be wrong. Then came the discovery Gobekli of Tepe. What academic scientists did not expect was the discovery in 1994 of a site that includes a massive, complex and elaborate megalithic temple buried beneath the highlands of Anatolia, in southeastern Turkey, known as Gobelki Tepe, which means " Hill with the navel. " Initially, it was thought he had a similar age to the other megalithic monuments. Since the early excavations at its disinterment, Gobelki Tepe has many surprises. But none can "stop time" as the results of the tests to determine its precise age. To the dismay of academics, the carbon dating of Gobelki Tepe is a staggering 11,000 BC, a date too remote to fall within the accepted models of human evolution. Unlike the dates proposed by Schoch and other heretics, dating to the middle of the "Carbon 14" could not be questioned. Today Gobelki Tepe is considered the most important archaeological site in the world, and it is located between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, is considered by some eminent archaeologist, being the site of the fabled "Garden of Eden", even if only in an allegorical . Biblical references aside, the question still stands: those who built this incredible anachronism? Men of the caves? Aliens? Or a lost civilization of antiquity? For now, the academics had fled. Of the old buildings of 13,000 years so complex and elaborate as Gobekli Tepe, simply should not exist in the current way of thinking about prehistory. The fact that there has forced the Journal of Archaeology to rethink his theories of the ancient world and, most importantly, the people that lived in that world. Nobody in science official approval, of course, is still prepared to consider seriously the possibility that the complex Gobekli Tepe may have been built by a lost civilization that once populated the Earth, and perhaps it was more technologically advanced than is commonly thinking, and that has been wiped out at the same time allo scioglimento dei ghiacci durante la fine dell'ultima era glaciale. Sebbene tale scenario potrebbe venire associato al "mito di Noè" - l'estinzione di un intero popolo in una grande alluvione, o qualche altra catastrofe globale intorno a 12.000 anni fa - il mondo accademico resta fermamente convinto che tale civilizzazione non esistesse. Ma dunque chi edificò Gobekli Tepe? Incredibilmente, la visione accettata dall'archeologia ufficiale, è che i nostri antenati cacciatori-raccoglitori sarebbero stati in grado di "disegnare linee dritte". Quando solo una manciata di anni prima, gli accademici non retrocedevano dal dire che gli "uomini delle caverne" i quali popolavano la regione, non potevano in any way have built something as sophisticated as the Sphinx, the less the site of the temple complex of highly Gobekli Tepe, are now forced to reshuffle the cards and to admit you were wrong. now argue that hunter-gatherers of the ancient Neolithic structures built all by themselves. Although this remarkable reversal in the opinion of academics, has been hailed by some as a "breakthrough", while others remain convinced that these ancient structures, such as the Sphinx and Gobekli Tepe, are traces of a lost civilization. However, we think, what can be defined as certain is that the figure of 11,000 years BC Gobelki Tepe, from the carbon dating, it means that we can riesamenare the evidence regarding the age of the Sphinx with renewed enthusiasm. Commenting on the work of Robert Schoch on the new dating of the Sphinx, remember, the Egyptologist Carol Redmount University of California, said: "There is no evidence that could be true!" His reasons for this opinion were that the tribes of hunter-gatherers of that period "did not have the technology, government institutions or even the desire to build such structures thousands of years before the reign of Khafre." We now know that Carol Redmount was wrong. But Robert Schoch was not the only voice in the wilderness, proclaiming a point of view alternative. According to certain alignments astroarcheologici discovered by Robert Bauval and Graham Hancock, have been suggested dates far older than the pyramids of Giza and the Sphinx. These dates are, of course, "thrown in the garbage" by the scholars official, but with the discovery of Gobelki Tepe, a new perspective was launched when it was built on the Giza complex. According to the record, the combined works of Hancock and Bauval proposed dates set around 10,500 for the construction of the Sphinx, and suggest how it could be even older. To some extent, this view is shared by writers and Egyptologists. John Anthony West, whose research during the 70's and 80's he concluded that the Sphinx was far older than orthodox archaeologists were prepared to accept. West also concluded, moreover, as there were good chances that could have been built by a civilization now lost in the mists of time. Similarly for Schoch, West suggested that the erosion of the pedestal of the Sphinx, due to the action of water, felt like the monument in question was much older than 2,500 BC, the date usually attributed to it. Because of evidence of erosion due to heavy rainfall rain - it was pointed out - the Sphinx must have been built in a period close to 10,000 years ago, the last Once the region was the scene of rainfall that can cause similar erosion. And in a recent study entitled Geological aspect of the problem of dating the great egyptian sphinx construction ("Geological problems of Egyptian chronology of major construction - call - Sphinx") published in 2008 and presented at the International Conference and Geoarchaeology Archeomineralogia, evidence was presented showing that the construction of the Sphinx is in fact back-dated back in time to the Pleistocene era, ie 10,000 years ago. It should be noted that the main argument in favor of so-called "official date" of 2,500 BC for the building of the Sphinx is highly dependent dal confronto coi monumenti raffiguranti volti umani come quello del Faraone Chefren (2520-2494 a.C.). L'archeologia ufficiale insiste col dire che la Sfinge è un qualche tipo di monumento dedicato al Grande Faraone perchè vengono percepite somiglianze nel volto scolpito. Ma dovrebbe anche essere osservato che diversi test di tipo forense hanno dimostrato come il volto della Sfinge non è presumibilmente quello di Chefren, e dunque l'assunzione che la Sfinge venne edificata durante il regno di Chefren è lontana dall'essere certificata una volta per tutte. Infatti, molte delle evidenze tendono adesso a supportare i punti di vista degli eretici, su come la Sfinge possa essere stata edificata all'incirca nel 10.500 a.C., diventando così praticamente contemporanea al complesso di Gobelki Tepe, entrambi con un'età di 12.500 anni. E' interessante rendersi conto di come un crescente consenso sia pronto anche ad accettare come una "perduta" civiltà, la quale popolava le aree costiere del mondo antico possa avere costruito la Sfinge, così come le piramidi e Gobelki Tepe, prima di essere spazzata via da una grande alluvione causata dallo scioglimento delle calotte di ghiaccioo alla fine dell'ultima era glaciale, verso il 10.000 a.C. Ricerche in questo ambito sono in corso, e i prossimi aggiornamenti potranno riservare sorprese. Queste antiche meraviglie sono state costruite grazie all'aiuto di intelligenze non terrestri da una civilizzazione umana avanzatissima completamente Unknown? Or were built by our hunter-gatherer ancestors, "cavemen" who populated the North-Middle East between 12,000 and 13,000 years ago?!
.
source: www.antikitera.net
0 comments:
Post a Comment