Reception Invitation Wordings Invite Friends

Obama, Brzezinski and Mumbai



Obama, Brzezinski e Mumbai

Manuel Zanarini

27 novembre 2008
Fonte: -http://www.anchesetuttinoino.splinder.com/
Segnalato da: Arianna editrice - Rassegna stampa del 27 novembre

Abbiamo ancora tutti negli occhi le impressionanti scene degli “attacchi terroristici” di ieri a Mumbai, la capitale economica dell’India. Ovviamente, è arrivata la prima rivendicazione, a firma “Deccan Mujahideen “, sigla praticamente sconosciuta. Chiaramente, to do a full analysis of the story, we have to wait a few days and try to figure out which tracks are the most credible, it should be remembered that in India there is also a strong component of communist guerrillas. Personally, I think difference is that this is what in slang is called "false flag attack", ie an 'operation carried out or tolerated by the secret services in order to trigger a reaction exponentially higher, the most famous cases of this kind are Pearl Harbour 11 September

To explain my opinion, I'll step back a little, the American election campaign and its "hidden mind." The real "brain" of 'Operation Obama "is that Zbigniew Brzezinski, a university professor and founder of the Trilateral Commission. I will not elaborate too much on this subject, but suffice it to say that the Trilateral Commission, is an organization that includes the most prominent politicians and businessmen Europeans, Americans and Asians. In several of his books, the most significant of which can be regarded as "The Grand Chessboard" in 1977, Brzezinski argued that the priority for the United States should be taking control of the heart of Eurasia, in particular, energy resources of 'Central Asia. As it happens, in its election campaign, Barack Obama ha dichiarato che se fosse stato eletto avrebbe spostato le truppe dall’Iraq all’Afghanistan (“dove si nascondono i terroristi che ci hanno attaccato”) e inoltre affermava che se il Pakistan non avesse fatto nulla per fermare i terroristi presenti sul suo territorio, sarebbe intervenuta direttamente Washington. Solo coincidenze, oppure le parole dette da Obama sembrano prese dai libri di Brzezinski? Direi che vi sono pochi dubbi, soprattutto se si guarda ai primi nomi che circolano sul suo governo, da Axelrod alla Clinton, per finire con Volcker, tutti membri della Trilateral o del suo fratello Bilderberg Group. A questo va aggiunto che l’India si trova sostanzialmente ad un bivio: restare un alleato fedele di Washington, come negli anni passati, oppure avvicinarsi a Russia e Cina per creare un polo alternativo?

La mia impressione, pertanto, è che assisteremo, nel breve tempo, ad un’accentuarsi dei conflitti in Asia. Anzi a dire il vero ci sono già i primi segnali: basti considerare la situazione della Thailandia che internamente è minata dall’esercito(da sempre vicino alla CIA) che sostiene gli oppositori del governo, e all’esterno attaccata dalla Cambogia che da tempo ha l’appoggio di elementi del Bilderberg Group; oppure al Pakistan, e alle dimissioni forzate di Musharraf; e ora tocca all’India, colpita pochissimo tempo dopo l’insediamento di Obama alla Casa Bianca, e dove i “terroristi” non wanted to attack Westerners in general, but "accidentally" only those of U.S. or British nationality.

This could provide a "justification" for Obama to "invade" the heart of Asia, according to the will of his leadership Brzezinski. More or less what happened with Afghanistan and Iraq after September 11. Which leads me to two observations. The first is that perhaps all those who are exalted to the Obama victory, should reflect more on what really happened in Washington. The second is that this time I do not know if Russia, now surrounded, and especially China, which desperately needs energy resources Central Asia, they'll be watching. My assumptions or reality? Soon we will have the answers.

The Wizard Was Interrupted Command & Conquer 3

Osama Bin Laden



's all fake, it's all a chain.

When To Wash Linens From Scabies

choose and work on primitivism



comes the time when there can be questioned on their militancy and what you want to be. Must be able to deep and unbending criticism.
What you want to be?
What is being done in this direction? You're doing? You could do better? What should we do and how? It is often assumed
damage targets and feedback that does not exist, or are just ephemeral. The rooting hard work and perseverance, we should design and build an action that is methodical, otherwise you will not get anything.
The key point on which we must insist is the change in approach to reality, but also to themselves and to their ideas. Innovate . This is clearly the greatest difficulty, because the problem is not so much to be men of his time, but knowing that earlier .
To achieve this goal, to change the approach to reality must be able to sacrifice everything that is not essential. Stripping of the superfluous, for what hinders and prevents the achievement of strategic goals and fundamental stages. Too many cliches and stiffness of front end col diventare zavorra.
Affinchè si muti prospettiva e si riesca ad anticipare i tempi, bisogna operare almeno su tre piani:

-interno alla comunità: formazione e selezione. Raggiungimento di un livello sufficiente di presenza a sè e preparazione pratico-intellettuale a breve termine. Senza preparazione e sacrificio non c'è azione e operatività progettuale. Esempio.

-radicamento sul territorio: attivismo e apertura. Sapersi rapportare in modo flessibile e coerente a seconda delle situazioni. Mantenere lo stile ma abbandonare tutte quegli aspetti estetici e linguistici che ostacolano un contatto umano. Interrogarsi su cosa fare e come farlo. Costruire con costanza e perseveranza una presenza sul territorio puntando su pochi argomenti sensibili e di ampio interesse (ad es. ambiente). Richiedere impegno e costanza dalla comunità. Uscire dalla propria cerchia, estendere le conoscenze, aprirsi positivamente. Riscontri positivi si ricavano già nel medio periodo.

-collaborazione con le istituzioni: dialogo, diplomazia, affidabilità. E' un ambito che richiede tempi lunghi per dare dei frutti solidi negli anni. Bisogna puntare sui rapporti umani curati da persone preparate, capaci e versatili. Intelligenza propositiva e capacità di cogliere le occasioni.

Robin Hood Men In Tights Kazoo Song Ringtone

commento a un post di http://nazional-anarchismoitalia.blogspot.com

Riguardo all'anarco primitivismo, sorgono due problemi di fondo. Il concetto di alienazione e l'idealizzazione del passato primordiale.
Alienazione è un falso concetto, pretende di essere "originario" e "scientifico" ma non lo è affatto. Il concetto di alienazione presuppone un'idea metafisica dell'uomo come esso dovrebbe essere - e non è più. Ma chi lo decide? Marx? Zerzan? Manca un'indagine originaria autentica, se vogliamo tradizionale o ontologica, dell'essere uomo storico. Perciò il fondamento su cui Zerzan - autore peraltro affascinante ma utopico - costruisce la sua dottrina è debole. Alienazione è un concetto non "scientifico" né "universale". Alienazione per me è una cosa del tutto differente dalla sua e la metafisica che questo Marx's concept of derivation presupposes is the most anti-humanizing exists. It Stradic man from his real life and instinctive, stopping in a metaphysical pseudo-scientific concepts and use political and propagandistic. You are right to point out: remember that we are men. Man is creator and costuttore from the beginning.
Anthropology says that man is different from animals because he has no innate defense tactics and survival. So, if you want to live, must create them. Read arms fire and plow. Otherwise, man would be extinct for millennia, as who knows how many other species. The human instinct is to choose its vital instincts. Culture means then put in order this multiplicity of instincts accessible (see Gehlen, Spengler).
Consequently, the idea of \u200b\u200ba pre-technological society and the anti Zerzan impractical. First why do not you consider that without the current technology, the vast majority of the world population would die - which would also be acceptable from a perspective radically primitivsta and environmentalist, but then it is more consistent Linkola. In a society of subsistence food is not available to everyone. If billions of people today sproofondassero in a pre-technological primitive damage to the ecosystem would be immensely greater than the current ones! Enormous damage to the fauna and flora, besieged by hordes of affamti who can no longer find il cibo nei supermercati e nei negozi. Le condizioni attuali non permettono dunque, a meno di un enorme diminuzione della popolazione umana, un ritorno a società senza tecnologie e basate su caccia e sussistenza.
In secondo luogo gli anarcoprimitivisti si creano una sorta di visione irrealistica della società dei primordi e dell'uomo primitivo. Nessuno oggi potrebbe sopravvivere in quelle condizioni. Come un aborigeno non riesce a vivere in una città, così un uomo della città nel 90% dei casi, se lasciato solo nella giungla, morirebbe. Non sarebbe neppure un male di per sè, si insisterebbe in una situazione di selezione naturale e conflitto, ma allora il discorso si fa ben più radicale e serio rispetto al ritorno al "paradiso in ground "of primitivism.
will also be primitive, but the computer they use.
Technology is a product of human nature, it requires not so much a rejection, but a new type of man.
A final point: much more serious and radical I think the challenge Stirner. It 's almost heroic when he says: I have built my case about nothing. In other words: if I make a clean sweep of all, what remains? Who am I? What I want to be? If one is put with their backs to the wall and start work first of all on himself. A sort of Fight Club pre-litteram.

Petedge Zanies Are Junk

Prevent madness! Jean


www.noreporter.org

want the dead just got to want to be the " revolutionary " frustrati dalla perdita di ogni consenso e addestrati dai loro seminari politici all'eliminazione degli avversari è quasi normale. Non è normale, non è usuale, non è ammissibile, non accadeva neppure negli Anni Settanta, quello che alcuni fiancheggiatori, protettori e complici dei frustrati dei Centri Sociali e di Rifondazione stanno oggi facendo.

Non è accettabile che escano articoli compiacenti con i facinorosi, gli aggressori, i mazzieri stipendiati dai partiti, che alcune testate nazionali (Corriere della sera, Repubblica) hanno pubblicato. Non è immaginabile che si lascino esporre all'università liste di proscrizione con nomi e foto degli obiettivi da colpire, com'è accaduto lunedì mattina. E questo aftermath of a first series of assaults committed in Italy by the sudden appearance of seasoned various attacks on various targets. A grim scenario that repeats itself. Allowing all this means, just like thirty five years ago, the spiraling food stop instead.

that is not forgivable, thirty-five years later, a calculation for two-bit politician, there are those who, like Di Pietro, Giacomo Mancini traces the path of a wink to those who "kill a fascist is not a crime." Mancini repented, but it was too late. Peter might regret it but right now he has no excuse because he has before his eyes he saw that the old blood in rivers because of political cover to terrorism that the nascent socialist leader then, as the IDV of today, had been unable - or unwilling - to see. Serious, but paradoxically in the severity we have already gone beyond.

Rai At last night was aired a movie perhaps provided by your Student Block and were incredible set of still images on the Block Student students with the request: "Do you know who I am? What are their names? Where do they live? ". Since the block that has nothing to hide has provided many movies to the media, and as the faces and names of boys who are regular policy and require permits are known to police, this appeal can not have any effect other not to warm the hearts of those who are already stirred up unconscious on the ground of anti-militant from the secretariat of a party that no longer has any political issue and will have no other consequence but to make it clear to those involved in the manhunt that enjoys an extensive and widespread coverage.

If you do not stop them now will not take long to kill! Of course, as the first act will be prosecuted legally who uses television as a personal tool and puts at risk the safety of students, but not enough. We urgently need a firm stance on the part of journalists and parliamentary questions are essential.

Thirty years ago it was decided to let the fire burn but this time, per fortuna, non ci sono solo piromani. Ma un pompere che dorme diventa incendiario a sua volta. Non si sottovaluti il pericolo e non si frappongano indugi! Neutralizziamo i mandanti e facciamolo subito!

Gabriele Adinolfi

What Hot Sauce Does Five Guys Use?

Thiriart: Turning alone



Dal libro di Jean Thiriart : Un impero di 400 milioni di uomini L’Europa

Cominciare da solo
e contare su se stesso

“Vi sono delle persone che davanti ad una rivoluzione, nella sua origine, si comportano esattamente come dei giovincelli davanti alla porta di una casa di malaffare: dandosi dei colpi vicendevolmente col gomito: “se vai tu, vado too. " Finally there is neither.
so before the proposal of a "long march politics" fade away on the pretext that "there are still others do not." Prisoners of herding and are not only what the "others" do. So much for the men individually.
But when you look at the conduct of political groups that claim to be competing - in fact they are not because they have different objectives - these are an excuse that "this would be an approach" to stay in their position and stalling. The selection of a small number will work from a great number.
so happens to salmon in a very few reach adulthood. It so happens to human elites and especially the revolutionary elite.
The same applies to the revolutionary groups or small groups. A revolutionary group has always been at the start - of necessity - a small group. For this is a must start by "just". Wait for the others, want the "allies" is to behave as a follower and not a precursor.
And especially when a group starts up seeing their ranks swell.
By way of a fanfare of country: as long as it prepares its instruments, polarizes the attention of a few fools, but as soon as si mette in marcia e incomincia a suonare i suoi strumenti, uno per uno, gli sciocchi diventano seguaci.
Traendo una lezione da questo, diremo che non bisogna attendere di avere una orchestra al gran completo per mettersi in moto. Una volta iniziata la marcia, quel clarinetto che mancava arriverà, quel flautista che mancava verrà anch’esso.
Così nella sua tecnica di reclutamento – ciò non è valido per il combattimento – il movimento dovrà manifestarsi anche quando i suoi effettivi sono visibilmente incompleti, anche quando i suoi obiettivi sono smisurati e apparentemente assurdi rispetto alla sua consistenza.
Rimandare sempre la marcia con il pretesto che non si è ancora abbastanza numerosi, vuol say definitively condemned to inaction. Those who are discouraged by the small number, do not possess the qualities essential to the true leader, the ability to act with a number of desperate "and to do something not because there are possibilities that it succeeds, but it has to be done.
The difference between the two types of men can be easily observed even in everyday life. A man defending his wife against two thugs without bothering about its numerical inferiority, he will do it because "this has to do."
Similarly, in the middle of winter, a man will throw cold water to save a young man without waiting fire brigade or an ambulance because "this must be done." It 's the sense of active duty.
The company's national-European revolution is an action that will succeed. E 'in the sense of the life of nations.
But when a man reaches our phalanx, it matters little that he knows he can see the victory. The road to this victory is littered with graves, we do not have any doubt.
For the man of duty, conscription should not be determined by the certainty of victory, and his enrollment must be an act of faith, an act of duty and conduct a mission.
Whether it's the 2nd or 200,000 or even 2,000 ° ° and reaches the formation, this - for people of value - has no intrinsic meaning. He comes as soon as he knew, he enlisted not just a means to enlist was offered for the first time.
When a man of courage rises four at the steps of a burning building to go to save a child, does not care whether the firemen, who were called, are still at 1 km or 10 km from the site of an accident .
E 'such actions as may be the elite and the elite Revolutionary. Only they do "what needs to be done." People with no decision is often justified their inaction by reasoning about an "awakening" safe Army or a safe supervision of the Church.
They then say: "never allow this Army," or "the ancient Church in her wisdom and her power, will put a brake in time."
It is still pseudo-justifications of cowardice and laziness.
Army "that do not leave" is a myth. The military - and especially those of higher grade - officials are worried about retirement and their sense of honor does not come to get them over the state.
The Church is full of progressive and mentally weak, politically.
Army and church are corrupt as the rest of our society. Leprosy of cowardice they have not been spared.
We will have to start alone, terribly alone. Certainly not think that the current wave of bank cowardice and desertion is established as the place of foreign military, the Church or the magistrates.
was little weakness in small weakness, they do leave everything except rare exceptions.
The rebirth of physical courage in Europe will be prepared by a small group of avant-garde: that which we call here.
only after the elements of this' Army, the Church, the Judiciary will regain their courage and help us. But the former are
ONLY, terribly alone. "