
philosophy and metaphysics. Metaphysics is the history of thought that thinks the being of but forget to think Being in its truth as clear dell'aprentesi / hide. Forget that the institution can only be because originally there is an opening where it can be. Metaphysics is the real nihilism in the sense that metaphysics is the concealment of Being with the truth (αλήθεια) of the same. The decisive issue is that metaphysics can not think the essence of metaphysics and therefore can not reach its fulfillment. So the story of Being comes to fulfillment of nihilism as the oblivion of obscurity: metaphysics, can not understand it in its essential truth, believe the Being of thinking but forget it, primarily, to question its truth. Only
abandoning the philosophy metaphysics as it is then possible to bring fulfillment to the metaphysical and overcome it. You need a recollection of thought that out of the metaphysical perspective prepares the momentum to the coming-in the authenticity of Being. Heidegger says that the philosophy of simplicity has to replace a thought that ask only about what is worthy of being heard. "Thinking ahead is no longer philosophy because he thinks more originally of metaphysics" (Heidegger, Letter on Humanism ). Only by overcoming metaphysics can help overcome nihilism. It is at the end of metaphysics that has finally understood the forgetfulness of Being and then return can be a genuine request.
The end of philosophy means the realization of all its possibilities, the end is the recollection of his extreme possibilities. The end of metaphysics is realized in the organization of scientific and technological civilization euro-western. But in the end there is only a last resort, it also draws the first and initial possibility that philosophy, as such, could not take upon himself.
Throughout the history of philosophy up to Hegel, Nietzsche and Husserl, the thing that turns the thought is the subjectivity through which it becomes the present. In reference to what remains, however, something unexpected that can not be questioned by the philosophy. The body is shown in a light, light which in turn implies a clearing (Lichtung) that it crosses. The opening is what we give and receive grants, but also what is hidden and guards. Despite the beginnings of philosophy as the clear-this may be appointed (φύσις), this remains unthought as the light of reason illuminates only what is already open, but can not create the conditions of opening svelante.
Yet already in the Parmenides αλήθεια meets the "well-rounded svelatezza" understood as a surround where the beginning coincides with the end. "The first makes it possible to clear the path that leads to the presence and gives them to present" (Heidegger, The End of Philosophy and the spelling of thought ). The αλήθεια, but it is mentioned at the beginning of philosophy, it is still not well thought out because of his performance with "truth", which should then coincide with the concept of certainty and fairness in representation. In reality it is only the meaning of svelatezza that returns the true meaning and can be traced to the fact that any decisive certainty is part initially and necessarily in the clear presence. Experienced and is therefore thought that the only clear opening of the grants. What is the s-velatezza remains hidden. Not only because of the inadequacy of reason, but mainly because the veil itself belongs all'αλήθεια. The thought was essential
then, in the era of nihilism and made the completion of metaphysics in his last chance, the task of asking what remains unthought and is the simplest. In doing so the thought reconstructs the link to the source without which a people does not know its historical truth. "When we put again the fundamental question of Western philosophy on the basis of a beginning more original, are at the service of that task that we defined as the salvation of the West. It can be accomplished only as a reconquest of reports originating with the institution itself, and as a new foundation of all the actions of the peoples with respect to these relationships' (Heidegger, Europe and the German philosophy ). The report
that thinking must interweave with the truth of Being has nothing to do with the subjective approach. This return to be a metaphysical condition and unable to take ac-Being in its unveiling. Being a true knowledge-stand in which the Being open and gives the condition in which Dasein is always reduced, and is under-stand why there in his time he listens to the call of Being, is addressed to him by allowing him to open up in there. "Interrogation in an authentic way is to enter into harmonious agreement with what is being questioned" (Steiner).
The end of metaphysics, of course, does not involve itself in giving oneself to the truth of Being and his grasping. The end of metaphysics shows the first possibility which remains unfulfilled, and then to-be in the future as historical dimension of the authenticity of destiny. "The end of metaphysics can not in any way mean the end of oblivion dell’essere nel senso che l’essere diventi finalmente come tale oggetto di pensiero esplicito» (Vattimo).